Category talk:Grammar Pattern - Revision history

DigitalSoju at 12:50, 11 August 2009

2009-08-11T12:50:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 11 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Grammar questions==
			I think it'd be nice to have a section where we can ask for help or clearance on some grammar, for example currently I want to ask what is the difference between:
			*[[V + 아/어 놓다]] and [[V + 아/어 두다]]

			Just don't know what section to put it in, any ideas? --[[User:Bluesoju\|Bluesoju]] 12:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

	== Suggestions (Please add any)==		== Suggestions (Please add any)==
	*Past tense		*Past tense

DigitalSoju at 13:53, 19 July 2009

2009-07-19T13:53:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 19 July 2009
Line 73:		Line 73:

	If you need to do any replacing, Definitely check out [[Special:ReplaceText]]. Please be careful, it does give you a message after the first page to tell you what will change.		If you need to do any replacing, Definitely check out [[Special:ReplaceText]]. Please be careful, it does give you a message after the first page to tell you what will change.
			:Yeah it would be a good idea to change that, let's go with full lower case for all the categories. I was also thinking of making a fake categories page where we manually link the stuff so we have it the way we want. Some of the grammar patterns you added above are already listed in the wiki, but the search is so crappy it might not find them. --[[User:Bluesoju\|Bluesoju]] 13:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Mstrum at 05:18, 19 July 2009

2009-07-19T05:18:40Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Suggestions (Please add any)==
-*하지 말다
+*Past tense
-*대로
+**았/었 + 었다
 *(이)란
-*V + 지만
+*Since
 *Plain Form + 다고 (하다)
 *아/어 도
 We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms.  For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Mstrum: Added some suggestions

2009-07-19T04:48:28Z

Added some suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 19 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Suggestions (Please add any)==
			*하지 말다
			*대로
			*(이)란
			*V + 지만
			*Plain Form + 다고 (하다)
			*아/어 도

	We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)		We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Mstrum: /* Change name */ new section

2009-07-13T01:09:47Z

Change name: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 13 July 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*Colored tables ?		*Colored tables ?
	*Cases for past tense, present tense, future tense if the cases are different		*Cases for past tense, present tense, future tense if the cases are different

			== Change name ==

			Hey, I just installed a nice extension where you can replace any text across the entire wiki. That'll really help for changing names of things like categories that are found on a lot of pages. There's two mass replaces I would like to do. First, I would like to switch Category:Grammar Pattern to simply be Category:Grammar. Also, I'm planning on changing Category:Chinese Roots to be Category:Chinese roots. I just feel like it'll be better to have a simpler name for grammar and that the Chinese roots name needs to be changed since we've standardized on lower case letters after the first word. Any objections?

			If you need to do any replacing, Definitely check out [[Special:ReplaceText]]. Please be careful, it does give you a message after the first page to tell you what will change.

DigitalSoju at 00:49, 11 July 2009

2009-07-11T00:49:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 11 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)		Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
			:I have already made categories such as but, because, non final endings, etc for this kinda of stuff. Check the categories section. If you want to make it a subcategory, i think the pages need to be in both categories so the user can look for it in the grammar pattern category because he likely doesn't know the meaning of the pattern which is why they are finding it

			Also i'm not sure about the 할래 stuff, while it is a bit intriguing cuz the user might not know the full form of the grammar and just type that. However it would have to be done with every grammar pattern and that's time consuming. The next time is there is likely going to be a 할래 example or a 하다 example on the page, so it would appear on the search result anyway.
			--[[User:Bluesoju\|Bluesoju]] 00:49, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
	==Grammar template==		==Grammar template==
	*Add language translation to the button		*Add language translation to the button

Mstrum: taken from the brainstorm page

2009-07-10T19:50:48Z

taken from the brainstorm page

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 10 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)		Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

	~~== Split from Brainstorm ==~~

	==Grammar template==		==Grammar template==

Mstrum: /* Split from Brainstorm */ new section

2009-07-10T19:50:26Z

Split from Brainstorm: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:50, 10 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)		Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

			== Split from Brainstorm ==

			==Grammar template==
			*Add language translation to the button
			*Table for conjugation rule?
			*Colored tables ?
			*Cases for past tense, present tense, future tense if the cases are different

Mstrum at 17:53, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T17:53:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 10 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)		We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

			Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Mstrum at 17:50, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T17:50:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 10 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We probably ~~shouldn't work on this until the learning hangeul section is done~~, ~~but maybe~~ we could ~~group together grammar forms into grammar lessons so people can learn them in groups organized by frequency/use~~. -[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 20:45, 10 ~~April~~ 2009 (UTC)		We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --[[User:Mstrum\|Mstrum]] 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)