Category talk:Grammar Pattern: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Split from Brainstorm: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to [[V + (으)ㄹ래요]]. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Split from Brainstorm == | |||
==Grammar template== | |||
*Add language translation to the button | |||
*Table for conjugation rule? | |||
*Colored tables ? | |||
*Cases for past tense, present tense, future tense if the cases are different | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 10 July 2009
We should probably start creating categories to help people easily fine forms. For example, we could have a 'want' category which has all the verbs that mean that. --Mstrum 17:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Just another thought, maybe we can create redirects so we can reference these forms more easily. For example, we could create 할래 and 할래요 to redirect back to V + (으)ㄹ래요. We could standardize on using 하다 to create the easy redirects. --Mstrum 17:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Split from Brainstorm
Grammar template
- Add language translation to the button
- Table for conjugation rule?
- Colored tables ?
- Cases for past tense, present tense, future tense if the cases are different