Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Vocabulary"
DigitalSoju (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
I think sentence examples should probably be on individual vocabulary pages, what do you think? That way, when words are used on multiple vocabulary pages (most likely to happen) we don't have to worry about copying examples and things. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 03:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | I think sentence examples should probably be on individual vocabulary pages, what do you think? That way, when words are used on multiple vocabulary pages (most likely to happen) we don't have to worry about copying examples and things. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 03:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Do you want to expand this project to a dictionary project as well? If so then that would definitely work. --[[User:Bluesoju|Bluesoju]] 04:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 16 June 2009
I think it would be helpful to develop a template for use on all vocabulary pages that lists vocabulary in a table so that the lists are easier to read. A possible table format might be:
| 한국어 | English |
|---|---|
| 우체국 | post office |
| 우표 | postage stamp |
Within this table, words should be listed in alphabetical order.
Also, why are we capitalizing the English words in the definitions? I don't think they should be capitalized unless they are proper nouns.
- haesook 17:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
We should come up with a standard. It would also be nice to have a header to use on all of the vocabulary pages. --Mstrum 19:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- If we make a table, maybe we should use a sortable table.. but if we make a table, what about sentence examples in the future?
I think sentence examples should probably be on individual vocabulary pages, what do you think? That way, when words are used on multiple vocabulary pages (most likely to happen) we don't have to worry about copying examples and things. --Mstrum 03:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Do you want to expand this project to a dictionary project as well? If so then that would definitely work. --Bluesoju 04:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
