Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Chinese Roots"
DigitalSoju (Talk | contribs) (New page: We can look into adding these images on the pages as well: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stroke_Order_Project Just make sure we give credit to the original project and abide ...) |
(→Dictionary project) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Just make sure we give credit to the original project and abide by their sharing policies | Just make sure we give credit to the original project and abide by their sharing policies | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Dictionary project == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we make a Korean dictionary section separate like wikipedia does with wiktionary? I noticed a problem with some Chinese roots have the same possible page names as other pages we might want to use in the future, i.e. 니 being the spoken form of 네(가) --[[User:Bluesoju|Bluesoju]] 01:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see where there might be an issue. The only thing about these is I don't really envision us creating pages for one-word vocabulary terms. I can see us creating a page like 'Me' or 'You' and including all the forms in those, but not really a whole page just for a word like 니 or 네. What do you think? I did think about that before I started, but I felt that there weren't any important single-character words that would need a whole page just for themselves. --[[User:Mstrum|Mstrum]] 04:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:00, 29 June 2009
We can look into adding these images on the pages as well:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stroke_Order_Project
Just make sure we give credit to the original project and abide by their sharing policies
Dictionary project
Should we make a Korean dictionary section separate like wikipedia does with wiktionary? I noticed a problem with some Chinese roots have the same possible page names as other pages we might want to use in the future, i.e. 니 being the spoken form of 네(가) --Bluesoju 01:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I see where there might be an issue. The only thing about these is I don't really envision us creating pages for one-word vocabulary terms. I can see us creating a page like 'Me' or 'You' and including all the forms in those, but not really a whole page just for a word like 니 or 네. What do you think? I did think about that before I started, but I felt that there weren't any important single-character words that would need a whole page just for themselves. --Mstrum 04:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
