Difference between revisions of "Talk:Important 한자"
From Korean Wiki Project
(New page: I would probably recommend that the first set of 한자 characters be the ones that are most commonly seen in public, on signs, labels and menus. Although I've found learning 한자 very ...) |
DigitalSoju (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would probably recommend that the first set of 한자 characters be the ones that are most commonly seen in public, on signs, labels and menus. Although I've found learning 한자 very useful for advancing my study, some people may not be interested in learning ones they won't see much. The ones I've seen the most on signs would include 大, 中, 小 (on menus etc.), 韓, 漢, 無, 月, 火, 水, 木, 金, 土, 日, 山, 美, 男, 女, 國, 年, etc. [[User:Jjukumi|Jjukumi]] 08:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | I would probably recommend that the first set of 한자 characters be the ones that are most commonly seen in public, on signs, labels and menus. Although I've found learning 한자 very useful for advancing my study, some people may not be interested in learning ones they won't see much. The ones I've seen the most on signs would include 大, 中, 小 (on menus etc.), 韓, 漢, 無, 月, 火, 水, 木, 金, 土, 日, 山, 美, 男, 女, 國, 年, etc. [[User:Jjukumi|Jjukumi]] 08:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lune, looks good to me the way it is, it might be used in an introduction section of that page maybe? Either way it's good information to include^^--[[User:Bluesoju|Bluesoju]] 18:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 6 December 2009
I would probably recommend that the first set of 한자 characters be the ones that are most commonly seen in public, on signs, labels and menus. Although I've found learning 한자 very useful for advancing my study, some people may not be interested in learning ones they won't see much. The ones I've seen the most on signs would include 大, 中, 小 (on menus etc.), 韓, 漢, 無, 月, 火, 水, 木, 金, 土, 日, 山, 美, 男, 女, 國, 年, etc. Jjukumi 08:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Lune, looks good to me the way it is, it might be used in an introduction section of that page maybe? Either way it's good information to include^^--Bluesoju 18:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
