wwidth=100%> [youtube (8Bdv2pHoFWQ)] ||
A controversial case in which YouTubers Cham PD raised on a live broadcast turned out to be true.
Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines|Advertisement Review Guidelines from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it will be a big deal if we do an "unclear commercial broadcast" called back-door advertising as it is now.
Advertisements using YouTube, Instagram, etc. must be recorded on the video whether they are advertised or sponsored in accordance with the revised Administrative Rules/Recommendations, Guarantee, etc./Advertisement Guidelines|Advertisement Review Guidelines from September 1, 2020. As it is the first system to be implemented by [Fair Trade Commission], it can be a big deal if you do an "unclear advertisement" called back-door advertisement like now.
> YouTube should have a title such as "[Advertise] OO honest review" on the video so that consumers can clearly distinguish it. Subtitles such as "sponsored" are also needed at the beginning and end. In order to make it easier for consumers who only see part of the video, the advertisement should be repeatedly displayed every five minutes. In addition, while the corresponding part of the advertisement is played in the video, banners such as "paid advertisements" should be attached so that viewers can confirm that it is an advertisement.
>----
https://mnews.joins.com/article/23808114#homeThe JoongAng Ilbo. 2020/06/30 [article]
Details
Charm PD's shooting controversy
Cham PD, who temporarily suspended his activities due to the Han Hye-yeon incident, is trying to sell the sandbox during a live broadcast on August 4, 2020.[[1]be/SBQE_-SLwA4s|#]], [[Kong Hyuk-joon|Pig boy who appeared as a liar][2].Be/UmwLT09kres|#]""'" and so on, sparking controversy. Immediately after the remarks, Dotti appeared on the show of Cham PD himself [refuted with SuperChat and later openly released his cell phone number on live, saying, "Let's talk directly over the phone." Naturally, there was no normal communication due to the phone calls from countless viewers. Cham PD's broadcast lasted until dawn and is estimated to have been watched by more than 20,000 people.
About disparaging other YouTubers
When viewers opposed the idea that he was a pig who appeared in a lie, he continued to make incoherent remarks, saying he didn't even know who Kong Hyuk-joon was, and when he found out that there was evidence, he did so when he saw a fake man. At the request of the viewers, I turned on the evidence video myself, but whenever a problematic word came out in a controversial remark, I suddenly said something else, so I couldn't hear it, and I didn't try to read that part while I was reading along, so I intentionally refused to comment on the issue. At first, he said he did not know Gong Hyuk-joon, but changed his words, saying, "I did not know him well and criticize him, but I spoke from the perspective of the viewers based on the attitude I showed to my favorite Kim Gye-ran." Since then, he seemed to admit his mistake, saying, "If you have said anything wrong other than this, please tell me," but about half an hour later, he again made absurd remarks, saying, "I have never criticized the performer," and "I don't remember," which angered viewers.
When asked why he shot Dottie, he said, "I think it's deceiving me to sponsor 100,000 won," and when viewers asked, "Why did you criticize me before then?" he declined to answer, saying, "There are many people attacking me."
Since then, he has made remarks such as "I don't remember" and "Did I shoot them or criticize them?" since 3:55 a.m.
Shooting in the back advertisement
Referring to Sang Yun-tsu, Kim Na-reum, Tzu-yang, Hamji and Moon Bok-hee, and so on, it ends as soon as I open my mouth. Referring to companies such as Sandbox Network, Treasure Hunter and MCN etc., all of these companies are paid advertisements behind their backs, and once they speak, all of Kim's new agency is actually [Paper Company, etc. In fact, controversy began in the beginning over the disparaging of Gong Hyuk-joon rather than the disparaging of Dotti, but the incident grew bigger as Dotti appeared after he ignored the manager's request to find out what he did wrong by watching the recording, but continued to explain it.
On the live broadcast, Cham PD continued to claim that the Korean [YouTube] edition was very dirty, while explaining that YouTubers (in fact, most of them [Korea] with 1 million to 4 million subscribers) could not avoid the charges and that they knew how much they had deceived viewers and subscribers, all of which were based on [fact]. However, all of these claims were made by a man who was drunk and forgot his words a few minutes ago. Therefore, it is doubtful whether this statement is true.
After shooting
After the shooting, the manager said that it was difficult to communicate properly. He has since written lengthy apology in his community. However, the response from the comments is very cold. Not only is the sincerity of the apology, but it also shows that Gong Hyuk-joon, who suffered direct damage, is just a specific person and avoids mentioning him as much as possible by dismissing his behavior as a drunken mistake.
There is no further comment on the statement, "Dottie is trying to sell Sandbox Network." The apology alone says Dottie seems to have shot a superchat to stop the back ad YouTuber from mentioning it, but in fact, Cham PD is trying to sell a sandbox, which Dotti is only refuting as a superchat.
When it comes to erasing the replay video, which he boasted never to delete, he said it was just a mistake, which is also somewhat questionable. At least if it was a real mistake, it should be explained through what process it went through. However, it is said that they have sent a request for restoration to YouTube to restore it. Along with these ambiguous attitudes, as I have reminded you, there have been many responses from all the communities that the Korean YouTuber's board seems completely unreliable, such as saying that the Korean YouTuber's board is dirty and mentioning an unspecified number of them, but in less than a day, [Tzu Yang] and [Moon Bok-hee] apologize for failing. But apart from this, there is a steady stream of talk about [Dottie] and [Kong Hyuk-joon] being sarcasticbroadcasting attitude.
The reaction of the shot YouTubers
As a Dottie individual, there is no official response yet except for SuperChat. However, Sandbox Network said it would respond to the incident.
He posted an apology on his YouTube community.
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
Hello, I'm Sangyuns.
In the meantime, I have informed you that it is sponsored by voice or add-on advertisement, free product sponsorship, etc., but I have also posted it on fixed comments, subtitles, and posts that are not noticeable at once, not my voice in the video.
And because I received the PPL fee from the advertiser, I should have clearly stated that it was not just a "collaboration" but a "collaboration" but a "collaboration" all the time. These are my faults that are beyond excuse. I'm so sorry.
I understood YouTube as just a social media that uploads fun videos, and I started to film and upload videos just for fun. But thanks to the excessive interest of many people, the channel grew in a short period of time, and as it soared, I should have grown with my perception, but I didn't.
I'm so ashamed and sorry that I didn't do anything that I should be aware of as a professional and professional YouTuber as I became a channel for many people to watch.
Before I could say thank you all the time, it was my first priority to have a better sense of work on my own and to let you know with the correct writing. I had to tell you clearly whether it was a "collaboration" or a "paid advertisement," and I had to post it in the video so that viewers could see it at a glance. I didn't follow the basics. Everyone, I'm so sorry.
From now on, I will also work hard to create a clearer, more honest and sound YouTube. We will make sure to specify the "Pay-Advertisement" banner or the starting point, middle, and end of the video so that viewers can check it out.
I sincerely apologize to the viewers for being disappointed and hurt by my complacent attitude. I'm sorry and thank you to YouTubers who work hard for honest and healthy YouTube.
I'll thank the viewers for every content, and I'll have a time to reflect on myself and reflect on myself, which I didn't even do at all.
I'm sorry again.
I'm sorry.
I'm so sorry.}}}}}} ||
||[to the community ||[*Writing at around 5 p.m. on August 4, 2020] |
A statement was posted on the YouTube community, acknowledging the back advertisement.
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
Today, I'm going to express my position on the 'back advertisement' which has become a big issue recently.
I wanted to express my feelings more quickly to all of you who believe in me and love me.
As each word can be treated as a legal issue,
I was delayed a little more because I should have accompanied you on writing.
I would appreciate it if you could think of it as a way to make it clearer.
1. You've only posted sponsorships in the further section, and now you've just inserted a 'pay-for-advertisement mark"?
On June 23, the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) announced the principles of disclosure of economic interests and the social networking services (SNS) such as YouTube and Instagram.
Guidelines for examination of marking and advertising on recommendation, guarantee, etc. (recommended guarantee review guidelines)
The amendment shall be finalized and implemented from September 1, 2020.
I have distributed the press reference material of .
(There were no guidelines for location/method/warding of the existing advertisement method, such as recommendation/guaranteed)
Many YouTubers, including myself, have used the ad-writing method to date, such as "more" or "fixed comments" and other measures.
It's hard to recognize that 100 percent of people watching the video are advertising, and it can confuse them so that they can't make accurate judgments.
It's a revision to the point.
It's effective from September 1st and it's the current publication period.
What is a public announcement period? - the period during which the law is widely known to many people before it goes into effect.)
As a result of consulting with the agency, we added a "pay ad mark" from July 24th instead of September 1st, saying, "Let's follow the notation from now on."
The most frequently mentioned video in other communities is the king bubble tea.
On the other hand, there is a post that may have been misunderstood, saying that it was not sponsored but it was only published now.
This is not true, it has been marked in the view since the upload, and as mentioned earlier, 7.24 days.
A paid advertisement mark has been inserted.
To be more careful and clear, we voluntarily implemented the "applying paid advertising" immediately.
It seems to have led to a bigger misunderstanding: "Now I'm putting up a paid ad."
See more until you click on the top or bottom line.
It's hard to be recognized by everyone.
Advertisers, agencies, agencies, and YouTubers will sign contracts for normal advertising.
Since last year, the agency and advertisers have asked for more information only when conducting paid advertisements.
I think it was a complacent thought that there would be no problem since we are in a legal relationship.
But it's obvious that I didn't produce a 100% recognizable video for advertising.
I think it was my fault.
I apologize for that part.
In addition, some people are curious about the scene of paying for food in the ad video, so I would like to explain it.
Most advertisers are franchise headquarters.
Therefore, the owners of the franchise stores that operate their own branches are private business owners.
I paid for the food.
(The payment amount is handled by the advertiser's claim, the agency's claim, the person's burden, etc.)
I also checked a lot of videos and community posts since the issue is an issue.
Once again, we didn't produce the video so that all viewers would recognize it as a 100 percent ad.
I admit that it is my fault and apologize again.
I would like to apologize to those who may have suffered damage directly or indirectly.
Finally, from September 1st, 'Revision of the Guidelines for Examination of Indications and Advertisements for Recommendation, Guarantee, etc.' (hereinafter referred to as the Recommendation Warranty Review Guidelines)'
Be familiar with the contents as they are implemented.
I promise you to be careful before making the video.
I will do my best to make tomorrow better and always better for you.
Thank you for reading the long article.}}}} ||
||to the community ||[*Written on August 3, 2020] |
At around 11 p.m. on August 3, [Kim Na-reum] posted a message about [[Back Advertisement] on his TV, saying, ``Since last year, the agency and advertisers have asked for more information only when conducting paid advertisements.[* Kim Na-reum's former agency is [Sandbox]. In other words, the agency that has requested it since last year is Sandbox.] This is a violation of the YouTube community line. Some point out that [Dottie]'s statement that they are strictly adhering to the YouTube community line is false. However, it is highly likely that Dotti talked about himself [[Sandbox Network] rather than each of his YouTube channels, given that Dotti mentioned through SuperChat that "critters did not do our advertising business under a non-exclusive contract." In other words, there is a slight difference between Dotti and Kim Na-reum's argument.
[include (Title: Import Document, this=paragraph, Title=TruePD, version=526, paragraph=5.2)]
He posted an apology on his YouTube community.
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
It's Hamji.
(The community posts that were posted before were not paid advertisements, but rather marked as paid advertisements and fixed comments.
It's about a misunderstanding because it says it was bought and eaten.
As someone said, I deleted it because I thought he was making excuses.
I posted an explanation about the video in question in the morning and thought about it while reading the comments, and they liked me.
I appreciate your trust and your support, but on second thought, it's clear that I did something wrong, so I'm going to have to do something about it.
I wanted to tell you about it.
When I first started YouTube and the channel suddenly started to grow, there were countless paid advertisements and sponsorships that were never before.
They're starting to come in.
I didn't receive it before and I didn't belong to MCN, so I didn't know about it in detail.
I ran the channel thinking that it would be okay if I followed the law and the YouTube policy.
So I thought there was no problem because I didn't talk as if I bought it and uploaded the video like that.
Meanwhile, I realized that I had to mark the phrase "paid advertisement" in the explanatory column (more section)
Among the previous videos, I received a reward advertisement and inserted the phrase into the more visible column of the unmarked videos.
※ The advertisements received between October and December of 2019 are marked.
It wasn't written and I don't remember exactly, but between late December and early January, I modified all the videos that were not marked for paid advertisements and put them on the description box. Since then, it was before the revision of the Fair Trade Commission between January and early July, I marked "See More" at the bottom.
And as these issues have recently become an issue, I realized that from September 1st, related contents should be inserted at the beginning, end, or middle part of the video for paid advertisement or product sponsorship.
And up until now... ...I thought there was no problem because I uploaded it according to the YouTube policy and the FTC amendment.
So, in the past, when I saw a comment asking if it's a paid advertisement, I proudly marked it on the comment box.
I told you.
``I think it's my fault that I've told you so far.
After posting an explanation today, I saw a community post by a YouTuber and felt like I was hit hard on the back of my head.
From the third party's perspective, it was disgusting as he said.
After recognition, I also marked videos that were not previously marked, and I thought there was no problem because I did as prescribed by the law, but I actually thought that there was no problem, but I did not see any more or check the fixed comments, and on the other hand, I could not know unless I saw the details at the bottom of the act was deceiving the viewers.
I will acknowledge and reflect on my viewers' deceptive behavior by marking paid advertisements at the bottom of the intentionally invisible more.
(Paid ads are not intentionally marked out of sight for profit. In fact, if you mark it in the "more" section, you'll get more advertising fees, or the number of views.
There has never been a better performance.
The more you sell, the more you pay for it, and all the ads were one-time ads.
The reason why I intentionally marked "See more" is because I was aware of viewers' antipathy toward paid advertisements.)
job due to these wrong behaviorsI'd like to apologize to the YouTubers for their indirect damage.
want to
I will be more careful in running the channel from now on.
I wrote as I thought, so I don't know how to write, but thank you for reading
※ For profit in the above article, see below
I'm making corrections because I think there are people who have questions about not marking it.
As I mentioned above, the paid advertisement is a one-time advertisement, so there is no difference in the cost, so I will explain the profit of YouTube.
Usually, YouTube revenue depends on which country people watch it a lot (the unit price of advertising varies by country), how many views it has, and how long the duration of watching it is.
(Not 100% accurate because YouTube's revenue algorithm is unknown)
Since 80% of subscribers are foreigners, I knew that there is no big change in the number of views or viewing time even if I insert the paid advertisement display in the video and upload the video. In fact, I inserted the paid advertisement phrase in front and back of the advertisement video in accordance with the revision of the Fair Trade Commission, which will take effect on September 1st from mid-July, but the view time is higher than usual. (Normal depends on the menu)
The fact that I was aware of the antipathy mentioned above means that many Korean subscribers were uncomfortable with paid advertisements.
You may think that you can get more ads after making viewers less aware of it, but I've never thought about it that way because I've set the number to match the ratio with the cooking video.}}}}}} ||
|||apology from the community ||
Three apologies [* Primary: Apologize, Second: Apologize in English, Third: English, Chinese, Japanese] and translated [[3] to the community.
It also added that there will be no profit generation or video posting for the time being, and that it will not disappoint you by carefully considering the channel direction as much as possible during that time.
Shortly after the incident broke out, he posted an explanation on his personal SNS account that he had never done so, but as things got bigger the next day, he reversed his previous position on his personal SNS account on August 3 and admitted that he had made a back-door advertisement turned out to be true. [4]
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
Hello, I'm Moon Bok Hee.
These days, there is an issue with the so-called YouTuber's back-up ads (?), and there are people who are also questioning me, so I wrote to let you know how I'm doing.
Thanks to your love, not only food advertisements but also clothes, cosmetics, household appliances, cooking utensils, TV CF, and so on. I rejected everything that is not related to eating videos. I only eat what I like. I have my own iron rule of eating only what I like. So, I've only selected what I think will be okay and been doing advertisement for delicious food. (By ratio, 10 samples and 1 shot were made.)
And the advertisement has stated that it is sponsored.
At first, I wrote the word sponsorship for The View, but there was an opinion that I couldn't see the article well, so I've been writing both in The View and in the comments since then.
There's also a comment that says that you've revised the comment, but I've never modified the view and comments of the previous video recently.
Recently, the fair trade law's marking and advertising review guidelines were revised, and YouTube has been revised to insert the phrase "including paid advertisements" into the video and will take effect on September 1.
Since I found out about it, I've been exposing the phrase 'including paid advertisements' in my ad videos.
And as the law changed, we are revising the old video with the phrase "including paid advertisements." Some people said that there was a paid advertisement mark that wasn't in the cookie video, so the brand requested to change it in advance because of the law that will take effect in September, so we revised it first, and this video was also sponsored by the time of upload.
If I only want to make a profit or become more famous, I wouldn't have been reluctant to take pictures of popular menus, receive more advertisements, appear on TV shows, or other events, but if I pay attention to those things, I'm currently focusing on YouTube to reject numerous offers and repay you with only good videos.
From some day on, I realize that what I do can be of interest and influence to people, so I feel a kind of social responsibility and try not to miss anything.
I'm known too quickly in a short period of time, so I'm probably still immature, but if there's anything I didn't know, I'll continue to fix it.
Thank you!
- While I was preparing a video to be uploaded today, I wrote down a lot of comments on my video.
I haven't finished editing yet, so I'll upload the video tomorrow.}}}}}} ||
||Bok-hee's First Statement[* Upload on August 3, 2020] ||
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
Hello, I'm Moon Bok Hee.
I have something to say to everyone watching me.
I posted a message to the community yesterday morning because I thought I needed to deal with the issue of back-up advertising.
I realized that it was just to defend me with fear of being criticized rather than acknowledgement and apology, before I decided to correct the misinformation without being aware of the situation correctly.
I sincerely apologize for my poor handling and would like to be honest with you.
There's something I haven't been honest about starting YouTube and displaying ads.
I'm sorry.
(What I wrote emotionally is not directly related to my fault, so I corrected it.)
What I did wrong was...
1. 'There was a time when I didn't say it was an advertisement.'
I didn't think about the seriousness of advertising that it could affect viewers' purchasing choices, and I overlooked how important it was to make sure it was advertising. I'm so sorry.
We will modify the videos according to the regulations.
2. 'If you don't look further, there's a misleading statement.'
I wrote in the fixed comment that I brought it, but I wrote that it was sponsored.
Many people go by without watching the show, but as a result, I apologize for not letting the viewers know it's an advertisement if they don't watch the show.
3. 'It is not legibly marked as 'Advertisement video'.'
Viewers said they couldn't see the article in The View, so I wrote it in The View and Comments, but I didn't mark the video with paid advertisements.
Many people asked me to clarify the advertisement, but I responded passively. It's my fault.
I learned in July that the phrase "including paid advertisements" should be "required" in accordance with the law that changes from September 1, so I have put the phrase "including paid advertisements" in the videos since then, and now I am revising other videos.
4. 'I wrote the advertisement as a sponsor.'
I wrote the advertisement as a sponsor, not distinguishing the difference between advertisement and sponsorship. I'm sorry.
From now on, I will make it clear that the ad video is an advertisement with the phrase 'including paid advertisements'.
I sincerely apologize for my inconsiderate behavior, and yesterday's article seemed to have been posted without knowing my wrong behavior, so I was embarrassed and realized my ignorance.
There's no excuse at all.
I'm so embarrassed about yesterday's article and I'd like to delete it right away, but I'll always try to keep it as it is so that I don't repeat my mistakes.
Once again, I apologize for disappointing you for trusting and caring me about this.}}}} ||
||Bok-hee's 2nd Statement (apology)[* Upload at around 6 a.m. August 4, 2020] ||
And not long after admitting to the back advertisement on August 4, the advertisements began to appear on videos that had not been marked. ``It's clear that viewers who pretended to be buying for themselves after receiving advertising costs, so it seems that there will be a certain level of decline in the number of Korean subscribers, if not foreign.
There's also some controversy over the apology, which is criticized for driving the advertising out of the blue because they were afraid of sudden personal attacks, sexual harassment and abuse.
[File:DD1225BE-EC70-4B5E-A733-026C39D88475.jpg]
And when this became controversial, I revised the article and apologized again on August 4th.
1. There was a time when I didn't reveal that it was an advertisement.
2. If you don't look at the view, there are some misleading parts.
3. It is not legibly marked as an ad video.
4. The advertisement was written as a sponsor.
Acknowledging these four wrongs, yesterday's article said, "I feel ashamed that I posted them without knowing exactly what I did wrong, and I realized my ignorance, and I have no excuse at all."
[5]
[include (Title: Details, Document Name=Tzuyang, Paragraph=4.4)]
Around 5 p.m., [Tzuyang] said [[6].be/K9OefWDyaBc|Explaining video] The main point is that the producers have thoroughly displayed all the advertisements so that Tzuyang would not be harmed by revealing the contents of their Kakao Talk conversations with the companies, and have flatly refused to show the ads to the companies that offered some back-up ads. However, he mentioned that there was a video posted in the past that did not indicate that it was an advertisement even though it was received, and acknowledged some of the controversy and promised to prevent a recurrence.
However, in the case of Tzu Yang, she has already mentioned the matter once in the past.[7][8]v=wlfy8hesIFU|#From 3 minutes and 15 seconds] That is, even though we've already talked about it in the past, we've recently posted an apology video again after it became controversial.
The video was uploaded in January this year before the controversy over the back-up advertisement began, and it has never been controversial, and even after the true PD's shooting, the video consistently argues that "there is only such a thing in the past, and since then, all of it is marked as advertising videos." Cham PD is believed to have shot the video without knowing it was uploaded in January this year.
"I don't see any intention of lying," Cham PD said. "Thank you for the difficult act of admitting to the early mistakes and asking for an apology." However, it was written in the form of "I accept that the comment is sincere," and many people are asking whether the producer has the right to judge others apart from Tzuyu's fault. As of 8 p.m., the comments were not seen, which is presumed to have gone down.
According to Fijial, Tzuyang's agency requested a comment. PD Comments
At around 9 p.m., the production team of the Tzuyang channel posted a statement of opinion aimed at [Hongsound] and deleted it shortly after. Tzu wrote that she would express her position within a short period of time, saying it was not something that had been discussed with her.
A streamer who was shot regardless of the controversy
[Include (Title: Details, Document Name=Confucian/Convention and Incident, Paragraph=15.1)]
Gong Hyuk-joon was beaten not because of advertising, but just because he was ``purely unfriendly.
The back advertisement described here was rather honorable, and he said that he wanted to donate, but he was denied the donation because the first thing that comes out when he searches for Gong on YouTube was the Onahall video. Eventually, he donated to a different place than he was going to do at first.Far from the back advertisement, no front advertisement came in, and he made a self-taught joke, asking me to put some advertisement in it. When viewers raised suspicions as a joke, all the jjageul they used to enjoy was paid for it, and Onahall cursed, saying, "Which crazy person would advertise like that?"
There was also a false article that said that Cham PD shot Gong Hyuk-joon for advertising behind his back.
List of Internet broadcasters who acknowledge back-up ads ====
In addition to the characters that Cham PD shot at, many Internet broadcasters are suspected of advertising behind the scenes. Despite the variety of YouTubers' genres, issues have been focused on eating shows and games.
[HAN HYEYEON]
[include (Title: Details, Document Name=Han Hye-yeon, Paragraph=4.1)]
[Wild Horse (Youtuber)|Wild Horse] =======
[include (Title: Details, Document Name=Wild Horse PPL, and Imaging Events)]
Acknowledging the suspicion of back-up advertising, the live broadcast involved [[9].be/8u6hayjN8g8|proceeded.]
Out of about 60 commercial videos conducted in the past, four were missing from the advertisement display.
List of affected Internet broadcasters ====
Usually, the broadcast mentioned that it was an advertisement, but the edited version is missing or the YouTube uploads do not have a paid box. In the case of paid boxes, however, it is not legally problematic if they are clearly referred to as in-video advertisements even if they are not attached. There are many videos of YouTubers who don't wear Euroboxes even though they put sponsor advertisement time at the beginning or end of the video like Pudifi.
In the past, when King Yeom was angry and aired the show, the main broadcast of Twitch revealed that it was an advertisement, but the YouTube editing video did not show that it was an advertisement due to his mistake, and an apology was broadcast.
Three months ago, he played Langritt and announced in advance that it was a paid advertisement, but he did not post a paid box when uploading YouTube, and admitted that Sony Show was wrong. He explained about the back advertisement, noting that he would post it after the broadcast.
[video (Catrix)[* Catrix developer explained that there was no back advertisement.[10]
[[11]be/rfOj_ZZjTy4|Pipa Mobile Video.] Originally there was no paid advertisement mark but was added after the incident.
As such, it has been revealed that YouTube videos often do not display paid advertisements. In response, he admitted that he was wrong and said that he would display paid advertisements in the future.
In response, the viewers said it was an advertisement on a live show, but the cattrix video in question was misinterpreted by the edited version of the advertisement.[* In fact, download links are posted in the corresponding cat-trix video description box along with other game ads.] He explained that he thought he could recognize the commonly said tension in the cat-tricks commercial video without displaying a paid advertisement because it was the same as the tension when the commercial was received.
He asked fans who play S.H.I.E.L.D. not to play S.H.I.E.D., saying that he was right about what he did wrong, and that he had nothing to say about this part even if he was criticized.
On the other hand, those who are negative about the explanation criticize that the subscribers' perception and advertisement notice are separate issues, and point out that the subjective part of the fans' shielding logic, which can only be understood by the regular audience, can be the supporting logic.
An apology was later posted on the YouTube community.
Immediately after the incident, suspicions were raised about the video of Myeongilbangju's play and he admitted that he did not announce the video through an apology. However, controversy arose over his sincerity as he left comments such as "I received an offer of advertisement during the game," "Thank you for visiting my YouTube," and "Please come to the live broadcast." Since then, Lucia has posted a second apology, saying, "I apologize for marking a paid advertisement seven months later, regardless of the reason," and "I will mark it all in the video, explanation and comments if there is any small sponsorship in the future." However, there was no specific explanation in the first apology that he claimed to have received an advertisement offer during the game. [[12]be/0AQKghV4I04|Applicable Video]
||<tablealign=center>tablebgcolor=#fff,#1f2023><tablebordercolor=#000,#888> {{#!folding [expanding and folding ]
{{{#!wiki style="text-align:left"
Hello, I'm Lucia.
First of all, I apologize for disappointing many people due to this incident.
There's something missing in the last fixed comment.
I wrote the apology again because I thought I had to make a clear apology and tell you the way to improve it.
The comments you gave me in question are also true, so I didn't delete them.
First of all, I apologize again for not informing you that this is an advertisement video.
The video is a paid advertisement, and it's been 7 months since the video was uploaded.
We apologize for any reason that we will mark the advertisement as paid after 7 months.
This is obviously my fault and it's something to improve. I'm so sorry.
I read your comments again.
As you said, I think I didn't even have enough apology letters because I thought I had to deal with it right away.
I was ignorant, and I was afraid you'd never see me again.
I think it has changed like my appeal. Once again, I apologize.
Also, from now on, if there is a small sponsor, I will write it in the video, explanation, and comments.
Once again, thank you so much for your interest in Lucia's YouTube.
I'm sorry for showing you my poor self.
We will inform you of any other processing related to the video.}}}}}} ||
|||apology posted on the video of Myungilbangju[*Written around 6 p.m. on August 4, 2020
Similarly, for live broadcasts, Millishita, Hunters Arena, Callop Mobile, and Sudden Attack were advertised, but they did not inform YouTube and posted a related apology to the YouTube community.
Other Internet broadcasters' responses
- On July 27, Cham PD suspended his activities due to controversy over his back-up ads, and Cham PD who was close to Cham PD and was a crew member also made his position known through related videos. [[13]v=IoFkzPflRPc&t|Entrance][* Notify my situation as well.]
- YouTuber Hongsound on August 1st also reported the status of behind-the-scenes ads of YouTubers [[14].be/cLA3r-z07J8|exploited.]
- In the case of YouTuber [[Panny Bottle], after the incident broke out, he wrote down the list he advertised and posted it on [15].
- Professional gamer Knee asked subscribers through [16] if there was anything wrong with his video due to the lack of light on YouTube.
- Streamer Pung Wol-ryang clearly stated that all games being promoted are advertisements in live and YouTube videos, and in case of YouTube paid boxes, the videos uploaded from late last year after the law revision was announced, but the videos from a long time ago may not have been set up, so we will check them out. As for the back advertisement, the company said that in the case of Steam Indie games, which are frequently played by Pungwol-ryang, the promotion price is not appropriate and the promotion is not coming in.
- Streamer Han Dong-sook made clear on the promotional games and said he would have forced the recent allegations against Maple if there was a backdoor advertisement.
- Streamer Ta-Hyun-Ni said that there were times when he didn't get an advertisement even though he worked hard on the related game broadcast, and on YouTube he didn't know about the paid box, but the editors checked it on their own.
A footnote
